All dogs are good dogs, and that’s what the Twitter account WeRateDogs is all about.
Unfortunately, some Twitter trolls like one named Brant (Brint? Brent? Bront?) couldn’t seem to understand. Brant tweeted at WeRateDogs to air some grievances against the account’s seemingly lenient standards.
Brant particularly took issue with the account rating every dog as a 10, or even a 11 or 12 out of 10. Quite the paradox.
WeRateDogs fired back with some infallible logic:
But Brant was not satisfied.
Brant challenged the dog-rating account to show some 3s or even 5 or 6-rated dogs on the account.
Of course, he was quickly refuted. Because at WeRateDogs, a 3 or 5 does not exist. Every dog is a superior dog.
Looks like Brant will have to find his own dog-rating system. We think he’ll be hard-pressed to find a better one.
Never be the guy who argues against cute dogs.